http://www.theage.com.au/news/National/SA-govt-to-ban-Hicks-profiting-from-book/2007/05/02/1177788212132.html
How much of this effort to disallow him to sell his story is out of fear of reading what he has to say about the conditions and events he experienced in G-bay prison?
How much of the large security beef-up for Hicks in jail is for fear-mongering purposes and how much is necessary?
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (5)

Venting Wasabi
said:
| The Hicks plea bargain proves nothing. The phoney charges remain unproven and the "tribunal" process remains an obvious set-up. The gag order has no legal standing, neither here nor the US, since the "crimes" Hicks was eventually accused of did not exist in law at the time he was in Afghanistan. And whether he writes a book or not, there are plenty of other "worst of the worst" who have been released without charge who have amply described the Guantanamo gulag! |
monsveneris
said:
Ricardovitz
said:
|
The Drug guzzling hippies and aging anarchist punks crying about how others HAVE ABANDONED THE RULE OF LAW. Well, you better wake up you drug-guzzling hippies and anarchist cripples, laws are made by those who are in power and made to be broken by those who usurp power from the weak. Your day is over. Our's is just beginning. |
Tickle me pinkle
said:
|
Most insecure and paranoid rednecks think that anyone not listening to "sweet home alabama" or that doesn't fit a preferred narrow stereo type are drug addicts and homosexuals. At least by observing the stark contrast between the paranoid redneck and innovators and thinkers we can confirm that the human evolution process continues on unabated. |
Bobby Joe
said:
Write comment












