Xenox News

Wednesday
May 23rd
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home World Middle East HOWARD RIGHT OBAMA WRONG. ONLY OSAMA WINS IF WE FLEE IRAQ.

HOWARD RIGHT OBAMA WRONG. ONLY OSAMA WINS IF WE FLEE IRAQ.

E-mail Print PDF
: starstarstarstarstar
Stout Aussie PM John Howard has called new US President hopeful Barrack Obama’s bluff over Iraq. PM Howard has rightly portrayed Obama’s call for the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq as a victory for Osama and his Al Qaeda minions. And no amount of squirming from the latte sippers can change that fact. The Democrat Senator Obama is making the same mistake other leftists leaders in the West have made: thinking that by cutting and running in Iraq they will appease the terrorists. But he is wrong. The terrorists will not stop at Baghdad. They will only be emboldened further, and with the continuing support of other evildoers in the region such as Iran, who knows what havoc they could wreak on our allies and friends.

PM Howard has rightly said that now is not the time to quit the fight on terror. Only by supporting our troops and their brave leaders can we hope to defeat this menace to our civilization. Indeed, with Tehran desperate to have nuclear weapons and only too willing to use them, the victory in Iraq is more crucial than ever. It is about time that the left side of politics stopped their cheap political point scoring and started to back our troops who are fighting for their freedom.


God bless.

Patriot
Comments (31)add comment

Digger said:

Obama and Kruddy are bosom buddies when it comes to given succour to terrorists.

Digger

Cranbourne
February 11, 2007

Lame effort so far - we must escalate said:

What about the terrorists in Iran, Pakistan, Indonesia, North Korea, London, Latvia and up the Kyber?

I suggest the US and Australia enforce conscription and deploy all healthy men between the ages of 17 and 40 to any country suspected of harbouring terrorists or weapons of mass destruction.

Anything short of this would be irresponsible and as the "terrorists will not stop at Baghdad. They will only be emboldened further" if we don't attack them at every chance.

Airstrikes over these areas will also help destory our evil arch-enemies.

Bombing the fuck out of Iraq is obviously not enough.

Start World War III now to protect the safety of our lifestyles.

February 11, 2007

Kathy said:

John Howard is right! Do you think he can multi-task and be pres of the U.S. in 2008? Hitlary or obama would be a disaster. I like Rudy, but he is weak o­n the horrible illegal immigration going o­n here. You guys have a great leader!! Don't even listen to the PC criticism from the white house; they have to say that to be PC. Bunch of pussies.

February 11, 2007

Adam said:

Howard said that an Obama victory would be a boon to "Al Qaeda in Iraq," which is quite different than Osama bin Laden.

Either way, it's baloney. We're escalating the war in order to prevent what our invasion made inevitable? Doublethink. You can't prevent what already exists. That's not leftist thinking. It's realist thinking.
February 11, 2007

Unregistered said:

I KNOW Howard is full of shit, because I'm a clued-in supporter of his. Listen, our little hero has been found out by the dullard Oz public, and they don't like what he has done to them one little bit!
If we don't step up the lies a lot, and soon, John will be thrown on the shit heap by the voters. Rudd is way ahead and we have to come up with a load of shit the public will swallow! THIS IS URGENT! SAVE JOHN!
- Raving Right-wing Retarded Ratbag
February 11, 2007

EyeOnOz said:

Maybe Howard's hearing aid batteries are low again? Are we sure he heard Laurie Oakes question properly? Has Howard used this excuse yet?
February 11, 2007

DOCTOR_BENWAY said:

It won't be long now. All the neurological signs are there. He is finished. Poor old fool. There is only one question I have:- How can I get John's shrunken brain into my lab before they bury him?
February 11, 2007

Phillip said:

Osama thinks the West will fold like the USSR in Afghanistan. The West must hold its nerve in Iraq. It might lead to tragic loss of life but it is better than price of failure: a fundamentalist Islamic Caliphate which would hold the World to ransom with it's oil production.
February 11, 2007

DOCTOR_BENWAY said:

Of course the demented old idiot is right! In their minds these lunatics are always right! Just give me 5 minutes with a scalpel or a rusty penknife, and his pathology would be revealed in his rotted brain tissue for all to see.
Remember, I'm offering 50 cents for his brain. Fresh, it must be fresh!
February 11, 2007

Phillip said:

Is this what passes for reasoned arguement on this website?
February 11, 2007

The voice of raisin said:

Yes, unfortunately it appears that you are not alone in thinking that carpet bombing and invading countries for vague, ever changing and unsubstantiated reasons is reasonable.
February 12, 2007

Ron said:

What a fuckin scumbag John Howard is.
Suck my dick you fuckin cunt.

You openly support the actions of the son-of-an-oil-billionaire father/family without question. And you, just go along with wars started on false pretenses. Then, you both get sick on young soldiers blood - getting light-headed with pleasure, and so stumble. Making comments like that about US pres. candidate and wonder why it blew up in your face (the scandal - not Bush's cock).
Then, you try and defend yourself and say that you were exercising free speech! What???? Free speech? You know very well that free speech is not guaranteed in the Australian constitution, so what are you basing this on? You are trying to fool the public again.
You take away any semblance I ever had regarding my right to free speech with your draconian Sedition laws where I can't talk freely cos I might say something that could be construed by your cronies as making me look like a terrorist.
So you shat on the sacred ground and then you walked on that ground, and stepped in it because the shit you layed there was of course in your path. And now you feel you shat in your own nest. Hahaha!

Fuck off.
February 12, 2007

Ron said:

You wrote: a fundamentalist Islamic Caliphate which would hold the World to ransom with it's oil production."

No Phillip, you got it all wrong. It has always been the U.S. govt and US oil companies that has held it's own people ransom. They have constantly bought engine technology that allowed cars to run on alternative fuels for years. Either that or killed the inventor. It is a documented fact they have been responsible for expanding the Los Angeles freeway system to the detriment of public transport. The proposed rail and tramlines and the ones that got built are either no longer there (ripped up) or they are very small or insignificant because of oil company lobbying.
So how dare you say that you fear a caliphate state will hold you to ransom? If they did, it would ONLY be because you did nothing about alternative fuels for the last 50 years at least. And all the while the West was promoting economic growth, fuelled by oil supply...and the oil supply was being helped along by US funding in order to get it out of the ground where the Arabs did not have the money to do it themselves.

And now you are so addicted to it, you are scared that it will be used against you. What a chump you look like.

February 12, 2007

LordyLordyLordy said:

Dreadful language there Ron! It is outrageous to say the PM is a fucking scumbag.
He is a 70 year old Fucking Scumbag.

I saw the Aussie defence Minister on TV last night and he seemed to offer some valuable insights into why must stay in Iraq. We have to do it for the children.

Obviously our children, not the Iraqi ones. They have never counted in their calcualtions.
February 12, 2007

Shrapnel said:

Australia - our once peaceful land under Howard becomes a terrorist target overnight.
February 13, 2007

agitprop said:

Holy fucken hell, the wheels are finally falling off the fucken fascist loony toons wagon John Rodent Howard has been doing wheelies in since '96! The rotten ratbag has lost it big-time! As for a direct link with terrorism and domestic or US politicians look no further than the Lying Rodent himself: rabid, raving and off his fucken gourd. Won't be long now, brothers and sisters!
February 13, 2007

Ricardovitz said:

If all inhabitents of the Middle East were eliminated, the world would be at peace and we would have no more problems until the Asian problem started to rear its ugly head; but that would buy us a period of peace of perhaps 20 years.
February 13, 2007

fren_zyd said:

Great idea Ricardovitz! Why not just nuke the entire middle east? Mass genocide has always been a poplular choice to create peace around the world. Just ask the Nazi's. You fucking idiot.

Is it possible that not every person in the middle east wants to bring destuction upon the west.

The only reason Iraq is in such a shit storm is because America invaded it to get there oil, and there is now no one to keep the sunni's and shiite's seperated.

The only thing the war on Iraq has achieved is more people that hate the west. And for good reason
February 14, 2007

james coorey said:

The whole war o­n so called terror is fake, and a lie. We have seen on channel 10 in Australia that how the attck on world trade centre was done by Bush administration to portray as a terrorist attack. One plane used in the attck was a cargo plane ,not the passenger plane. We have seen on television that one of the twin towers was blasted just before the plane hit it. It was clearly shown in a close up view that something was attached to the bottom of that plane to blow the building up. What else it could be? Obviously a bomb.
February 14, 2007

james said:

Since George Bush came into power, we have seen lots of destruction and chaos in the world. Why cant Americans let live others in peace to get some peace for themselves? Why they have to interfare with other countries domestic isues? It is very clear that United States invaded Iraq on the ground that never existed. Now the only way to establish peace is to apologise with Iraqi people and help them in reconstructing their country. But certainly Americans are not going to do this because they think they are super power and they can suppress anyone and whole world knows this.
February 14, 2007

Ricardovitz said:

On the other hand, lame-duck nations like Australia don't know how to rip the innards from an enemy that throws the first punch.

Islam drew first blood. Now, according to Islamic law, it shall pay 20 fold. The United States had and has every right, fillowing 9-11 to destroy the entire middle east. Only our Christian Mercy has held us back in this regard, but we do still have this right to utterly destroy anyone and anything that even remotely assisted those in the 911 attack. Yes, that includes ever Arab Nation and Islam itself. It is our God given natural right.
February 14, 2007

Ron said:

Islam drew first blood? You obviously believe all the lies your govt. tells you about who was responsible. I think it's scary that there are people walking around like Ricardovitzwho want to massacre all manner of people with arabic-sounding names, anywhere they live, just because of what they saw on TV that day, 6 years ago. That's the most scary thing of all. Frightening.

If I saw an American man in real life, say, on the street or in a pub, I would be so scared that I think I would I would prefer to just keep my distance from them and not say anything that might make them angry. ...thank you very much, sir.

What makes it worse is - they all want to kill people in the name of THEIR God...they think this is OK. Well, then it stands to reason that if this is OK, then it's OK for ALL people of ALL religions to do it - isn't it?.......so where's the problem???
February 14, 2007

Ricardovitz said:

I want to kill them in the name of their god - Allah, Akbar, Muhammed, or whatever.

And, yes, the Muslims drew first blood agaisnt American Civilians on 911. They actually drew blood when they bombed our marines in Saudi Araba, in Lebanon, against Christians in Africa and all Middle Easter countries, when they attacked the WTC in the 1990's, with Anthrax, when they flew a prop-plane into a building in Tampa Florida, when they set off bombs in England, every time they attack an Israeli, when they bombed Bali, when they attacked Christians in Chechnya...

The damned list goes on and on and on. Muslims drew first blood and they must be destroyed. All of them.
February 14, 2007

Ron said:

Ok....You made a strong point....only because your list of moslem attacks was so extensive. And I have to agree that the amount of attacks in Israel (as you mentioned) is quite unbelievable, if not pure insanity.
So then I am warming to your idea....not agreeing with you......just warming to it.
February 14, 2007

fren_zyd said:

I really hope Ricardovitz is taking the piss.

The United States has created yet another mythical enemy for everyone to fear, and to get all the dickhead rednecks onside, throwing there fists in the air and yelling 'nuke em all!'.

Dickhead rednecks make up a massive proportion of the population (according to the last census, 77%) and to alienate them through level-headed deplomacy would be detrimental to their election chances.

February 14, 2007

DOCTOR_BENWAY said:

I left the USA after the federal party-poopers wanted to interfere with pure science. Australia was once a nice place, now I can see it is a dystopian shithole on its way to being a full card-carrying hell. I can hear your objections - "we have the best politicians money can buy" - "we are not stupid slaves" - "we are well-informed" - "Australia is not as bad as Somalia, so it's still okay". My poor brainwashed creatures with large mental deficits, I have heard this sort of nonsense before, and it is a sure indication that the end is near. Your government is soon to apply a bastardized form of Recreational Psychiatry(TM) to the lot of you!
February 14, 2007

Ron said:

I heard an interview with some guy last night on a TV program about Al Quida vs. USA....I thought it was great and summed up where we are right now with regards to our irreligion (unless you call consumerism a religion).

‘When a society believes in nothing, the only agenda is fear’
February 14, 2007

FlimFlamMan said:

You won't have nothing to fear if you have your gun.

Whoops! Those bastards have taken them away from us.

February 15, 2007

Shrapnel said:

Muslims now, communists last time. Whatever the spin "Weapons of Mass destruction!!" the easily led rabid US citizens that support the gungho stuff have enough evidence that the only real reason is to keep the military production industry striving. It is crucial to Yank economy.

When the terrorist rationale becomes passe a new enemy will be constructed and Ricardovitz will jump on the redneck high horse bandwagon.

Eventually, like all empires, they will run out of cash and go into serious decline and we will have a new dominant nation.

Then the rednecks will have to hide in their dens and play with there guns while some other nations tyrant leader will be calling the shots internationally and causing wholesale slaughter for the good of everyone.
February 15, 2007

Sven Svenson said:

That's all it is, pure and simple: racism
February 16, 2007

Unregistered said:

Dollars: That's all it is, pure and simple: dollars...
- Big Spender
February 16, 2007

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smaller | bigger

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Other articles in this section for your reading pleasure...

Xenox Tweets

Xenox Gallery

  • More_Rogues_3

Interject Box

Pithy Quotes

" When choosing between two evils, I always like to try the one I've never tried before. "
Mae West

Xenox Login