Xenox News

Wednesday
May 23rd
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home World Middle East U.S. Forces Using Napalm and Chemical Weapons?

U.S. Forces Using Napalm and Chemical Weapons?

E-mail Print PDF
: blankblankblankblankblank
U.S. ATROCITIES CONTINUE IN FALLUJAH

BAGHDAD, Nov 26 (IPS) - The U.S. military has used poison gas and other non-conventional weapons against civilians in Fallujah, eyewitnesses report.

”Poisonous gases have been used in Fallujah,” 35-year-old trader from Fallujah Abu Hammad told IPS. ”They used everything -- tanks, artillery, infantry, poison gas. Fallujah has been bombed to the ground.” Hammad is from the Julan district of Fallujah where some of the heaviest fighting occurred. Other residents of that area report the use of illegal weapons.

”They used these weird bombs that put up smoke like a mushroom cloud,” Abu Sabah, another Fallujah refugee from the Julan area told IPS. ”Then small pieces fall from the air with long tails of smoke behind them.”

He said pieces of these bombs exploded into large fires that burnt the skin even when water was thrown on the burns. Phosphorous weapons as well as napalm are known to cause such effects. ”People suffered so much from these,” he said.

Macabre accounts of killing of civilians are emerging through the cordon U.S. forces are still maintaining around Fallujah.

”Doctors in Fallujah are reporting to me that there are patients in the hospital there who were forced out by the Americans,” said Mehdi Abdulla, a 33-year-old ambulance driver at a hospital in Baghdad. ”Some doctors there told me they had a major operation going, but the soldiers took the doctors away and left the patient to die.”

Kassem Mohammed Ahmed who escaped from Fallujah a little over a week ago told IPS he witnessed many atrocities committed by U.S. soldiers in the city.

”I watched them roll over wounded people in the street with tanks,” he said. ”This happened so many times.”

Abdul Razaq Ismail who escaped from Fallujah two weeks back said soldiers had used tanks to pull bodies to the soccer stadium to be buried. ”I saw dead bodies on the ground and nobody could bury them because of the American snipers,” he said. ”The Americans were dropping some of the bodies into the Euphrates near Fallujah.”

Abu Hammad said he saw people attempt to swim across the Euphrates to escape the siege. ”The Americans shot them with rifles from the shore,” he said. ”Even if some of them were holding a white flag or white clothes over their heads to show they are not fighters, they were all shot..”

Hammad said he had seen elderly women carrying white flags shot by U.S. soldiers. ”Even the wounded people were killed. The Americans made announcements for people to come to one mosque if they wanted to leave Fallujah, and even the people who went there carrying white flags were killed.”

Another Fallujah resident Khalil (40) told IPS he saw civilians shot as they held up makeshift white flags. ”They shot women and old men in the streets,” he said. ”Then they shot anyone who tried to get their bodies...Fallujah is suffering too much, it is almost gone now.”

Refugees had moved to another kind of misery now, he said. ”It's a disaster living here at this camp,” Khalil said. ”We are living like dogs and the kids do not have enough clothes.”

Spokesman for the Iraqi Red Crescent in Baghdad Abdel Hamid Salim told IPS that none of their relief teams had been allowed into Fallujah, and that the military had said it would be at least two more weeks before any refugees would be allowed back into the city.

”There is still heavy fighting in Fallujah,” said Salim. ”And the Americans won't let us in so we can help people.”

In many camps around Fallujah and throughout Baghdad, refugees are living without enough food, clothing and shelter. Relief groups estimate there are at least 15,000 refugee families in temporary shelters outside Fallujah.

© Copyright 2004 IPS - Inter Press Service


This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Comments (9)add comment

Anonymous said:

Why do you think the Bush League won't recognise the Internatinal Criminal Court! Why do you think they're threatening withdrawawl of aid funding to any nation refusing to ratify U.S. immunity from ICC prosecution? The two-faced buggers KNOW what they're doing all right!
November 30, 2004

Anonymous said:

There is a legal term for what the loony Bush administration is doing in Iraq: war crimes.


- Dusty Davo from Derrimut
November 30, 2004

Anonymous said:

The greatest danger to global security today is posed - and viciously demonstrated in Iraq - by America ruled by George W Bush and his crony capitalist religious whackos!
December 01, 2004

misha said:

If an "axis of evil" really does exist, it's pivot point is currently anchored in the White House, Washington... or perhaps some big rich ranch in Crawford, Texas?
December 01, 2004

Anonymous said:

didn't they find an axis of evil up joan crawford?
December 02, 2004

Anonymous said:

Uou people just don't get it, do you? Dubya and his mates WANT the world to go to hell in a handbasket because that will confirm them in all their mad evangelical delusion. They are fuckin crazy!
December 02, 2004

Anonymous said:

And here come another 12,000 U.S. suckers... er, I mean troops. Remember not so long again gung-ho Rummy and Wolfie and others all poo-pooing statements by army chiefs that it would take several hundred thousand troops to secure Iraq? Well, who's got poo on their face now?!
December 07, 2004

Anonymous said:

There was never anything altruistic about Bush's reasons for attacking Iraq. Nor did the attack have anything to do with Saddam's so-called WMD or the (laughable!) threat he posed to the USA and the world. Those behind the planning and directing of the US invasion must be indicted and put on trial for war crimes. Old Meg
December 09, 2004

agitprop said:

The Yanks are denying using chemical weapons in their attacks on and around Al Tafar(christ only knows what's happening to the 200, 000 poor bloody residents!) . But remember Fallujah? You can bet the Iraqis do!
September 20, 2005

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smaller | bigger

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Other articles in this section for your reading pleasure...

Xenox Tweets

Xenox Gallery

  • Crumb Pic_146

Interject Box

Pithy Quotes

" All you have to do is to denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. "
Hermann Goering

Xenox Login