Bush will cut off hundreds of millions of dollars in foreign aid to nations supporting the ICC but have not signed a so-called "bilateral immunity agreement" with the Bush regime. Once again, America threatens the global community.
The Republican bill passed Congress as part of a $US388 billion ($513.43 billion) legislative package covering spending of every federal agency except the Pentagon and so-called Department of Homeland Security.
It was approved by a weak, compliant Congress and signed by the smirking President Bush himself.
In part, the bill reads: "None of the funds made available in this act ... may be used to provide assistance to the government of a country that is a party to the International Criminal Court and has not entered into an agreement with the United States."
Jordan, which helped train Iraqi police and hosted conferences on the reconstruction of Iraq, will lose some $US250 million ($330.82 million) in aid.
Peru is expected to lose $US8 million ($10.59 million) for democratic reforms and agricultural programs, drug-trafficking, and terrorism.
"This is a serious escalation by the Bush administration and US Congress in its ill-conceived, ideologically motivated crusade against the ICC," Richard Dicker, head of the International Justice Program at Human Rights Watch said in an interview.
He called it ironic that the bill's passage coincided with new reports of torture by US forces of prisoners in Iraq and at the Guantanamo prison complex.
The International Criminal Court is the end result of a campaign for a permanent war crimes tribunal that began with the Nuremberg trials after World War II.
It can prosecute cases of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity committed after July 1, 2002, but will step in only when countries are unwilling or unable to dispense justice themselves.
The US government vehemently opposes the court, arguing that it could be used for frivolous or politically motivated prosecutions of American troops.
But supporters of 1998 Rome Treaty, ratified by 97 countries including the entire European Union, counter that it contains enough safeguards to prevent politically motivated prosecutions.
The court is expected to try its first cases of crimes in Congo and Uganda next year.
The society of nations must unite to oppose this latest threat to international justice and global stability.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (8)

Anonymous
said:
|
Thats right, we all should listen to those bumblers in Brussels and all those other "human rights" activists. What a joke! You clowns should remember it was the good ol USA that saved you all from communism and it looks like we'll have to save you from those mad mullahs of Islam. So how about stopping all you whining and start supporting the real fighters for human rights: Bush, Blair and Howard! Uncle Sam |
Anonymous
said:
|
It is US money. It belongs to the US. It does not belong to anybody else. For those who forgot - or never knew - what "belongs" or "owns" mean, please refer to any non-communist English dictionary. The concept of "ownership" is somewhat difficult to grasp. For example, unreasonable as it sounds. An owner does not have to give his money to less fortunate people who own less money. In some extreme cases, owners of money will agree to give money to others under certain conditions. This is sometimes known as "Alms for the poor", and is highly recommended by most religions. It is customary for owners of money to expect the people who are being given alms ("The poor"), to not turn around and persecute them (behavior known as "biting the hand that feeds you"). This includes asking the recipients politely to commit to not politically persecute Americans at the political court known as the ICC. I humbly hope that this simplified explanation will help throw light on the bizarre American custom of helping the needy. |
Anonymous
said:
Anonymous
said:
Anonymous
said:
Write comment












