More Comments

Who is this vulva?

Cunt

This word for the female genitalia dates back to the Middle English period, c. 1325. (Although researchers have found a London street named Gropecuntelane from c. 1230.) Although the word cannot be traced back further than this, there are cognates in a variety of other Germanic languages, indicating a Germanic origin.

Cunt does not come from the Latin cunnus, which is also a term for the female pudenda, although a common root back in the mists of time cannot be discounted. Use of the word as term of abuse for a woman is a 20th century sense, dating to 1929.

http://www.wordorigins.org/wordorc.htm

CUNT
KUNA = meant both Mother Earth in BASQUE old Indo European language and YONI
CUNTRY meaning Earth Goddess = country
As late as 1700 English peasantry still used this word CUNT with respect. Often it would be associated with a river or a township by a river mouth (river CUNNIT, now the river Kennet; township in Roman times called CUNETIO
since 1740 this word CUNT had been held to be obscene and was a legal offence to print it in full, thus the Partridge Dict of Slang (1726) writes the word C*NT (Silbury treasure 110)
VULVA is the accepted replacement for CUNT
KALI is one of the titles of the great Devi of ancient India, the goddess was called KUNTI yoni of the UNIVERSE
Many words and concepts come from this ancient word
CUNINA the Roman Goddess who guards children in the cradle
CUNABULA cradle, earliest abode, the place where everythig is nurtured in its beginnings
CUNICLE a passageway (underground); a hole
CUNNE; to enquire into, to explore, to have experience of, to prove, to test, to taste
CUNNING; to know, possessing a practical skill, able, skilful, clever, possessing a magical knowledge
1874 "I threatened to prosecute the village CUNNING WOMAN whose herbal knowledge and other wisdom continued to be held in high esteem by the villagers" (Silbury 112)
KUNTA (Norse) gave rise to the family of words such as KIN OF THE KUNT

http://www.geocities.com/unity1_nz/words.html

Would you like some pictures instead?

What is it with the "cunt" word and Xenox News?

Who is this cunt?

Tell us Mr (right wing extremist) Patriot, why hasn't the US given North Korea a three week deadline to disarm or be faced with attack?

Repeat; no terrorist, no matter how dumb, will be buying jack shit from Iraq while the UN are keeping such a close eye on them. Terrorist attacks from Iraq are so fricking minimal; its all propaganda.

I blame the shoddy editing of this "Journal".

They should make a special room at schools, right? And when the little bastards misbehave, or talk back, the teacher can say "one more time and your off to the special room". And if they do it one more time then send them there!
And in this room can be doctors and nurses and scientists with their white coats, and lots of big needles, and saws and stuff like that. And thats where they can do the experimenting! Right in that fucking room so those little bastards and bitches can get what they deserve!

ex-Teacher
Larundel Psychiatric Hospital

aint we seen this before?
and when can we get CD??

Isn't Australia they only place in the world that has allowed terrorists to make and test WMDs?
They allowed the Aum Supreme Truth sect to buy a farm in West Australia and make nerve gas and test it on sheep. This nerve gas was then used in an attack on a Tokyo subway.
I demand immeadiate action be taken against the rogue nation of Australia! It has condoned one of the most heinous and cowardly terrorist attacks of all time.
Just think, if those ding-a-lings could make a WMD on a farm in WA, why would Osama need to go get 'em from Saddass? They could do it themselves!

Howard's Press Club speech was remarkably pathetic. It was supposed to be the big convincing filibuster to finally get us all on-side for a war in the Middle East (a Pandora's Box with generational repucussions ). It was little more than a fart from George Bush's arse.
-Dusty Davo from Derrimut

If anyone anywhere had any doubts about the sanity of our PM's insistence on mimicking the U.S. lust for war on Iraq, the PM's barely comprehensible address to the Press Club confirmed the silly old bugger has trully lost the plot. The power-hungry PM even promised to never ("never ever"?!) deceive Australians on this issue!!! I guess when the truth hits the fan, he reckons he can always plead ignorance ("I wasn't told") as in the disgusting "children-thrown-overboard" affair.

With all of the UN heat on Iraq, no cunt ain't gonna be buying no weapons. Why start killing people en masse. I think that is what this thread is about and it makes absoulte sense. So many hypotheticals, justification for carpet bombing...no, we all agree, even that Patriot guy, there is another agenda, its called western global dominance. What John, short fucking accountant, Howard thinks he has got to do with it I will never understand.....unless someone sends me the dossier.

cunt london

I'll try saying it again if you like using other words. Mr Johnny is saying that if Iraq is left alone then other Rogue States will think they can make WMDs too and that would create an increase in the number of WMD vendors that terrorists could shop at. Not just Iraq. Fuck why I defending Howard's point of view? I'll tell you why because I hate it when people don't read posts properly. It's called the "nipping it in the bud" argument or you could call it the "nits make lice" argument if you like.

But the other 'rogue' states his talking about are already making the WMDs, more than Saddam!
The rogue state WMD and terrorist is crap; they are much more likely to get it from Russia or Pakistan than Iraq.

I think the main thrust of Johnny's speech was to convince us that if a rogue state like Iraq is allowed to continue then that will encourage other rogue states to aquire WMDs and then that would make it much more likely for them to distribute WMDs to terrorists. So that's the threat to Australia and Iraq's link to Al Quaeda. I wasn't convinced......

well fix it damn you!

The ABC have pulled this from their web site looks like. The page ain't there anymore.

Adolf was toight! Toight like a tiger!

-Gold Member

Maybe you shouldn't start be experimenting on the whole child first; just bits at a time. Y'know, like removing a toe or finger to start with.
That would be the most humane way to do it.

Curious,
Box Hill

It is my opinion that children have been experimenting with their parents since the beginning of time and not the other way around.

Dr. Zeuss

Yep, the USA is pretty obviously doing most of the defying and threatening... but don't you mean 'brakes'?

Parents have been experimenting on their children since time immemorial. Usually the first born cops the brunt of it as new parents struggle to come to grips with how best to raise a children. As successive children are born the parents are more comfortable in their role and are less inclined to dabble.

Well firstly if your going to do it, you should do it right. New inbreed strains would have to be developed so that all experiments would have the correct control groups and to eliminate any genetic variation. Obviously twins are ideal. And finally genetically modified children would be a useful experimental tool.
So once that was all done I would say that yes, children can now be experimented on.

Dr Benway

That's a tough one.
But I'd say after you have done everything you can with mice it's time to switch species and start sticking needles into the kiddies.

Prof Doherty

I guess it's easier to lay the blame on fatty than the parents.

Unfortuntly your language does not help the effort of peace and the spirit of healing . Aggression with aggression leads into a deeper quagmire of oppression by the forces of negativity. You should delete the ugly verbiage and see what is left and then go from there.

Hey. Someones gotta defend them. Now it's all falling apart.

blah blah blah blah

yawn

Hi, we've come to liberate you: ratattattatat.....wheeeeeiiinn: BOOM....BOOM, BOOM, ARRGHHHHHH.....crash.....mummy, mummy, Mu...whiz...plonk

Now where dat oil well.

Boom Boom Boom!
Lets go back to my room!

Here's your liberation: boom

A couple of Clinton leftovers pack up their bags and leave and you peaceniks think it's all over!
You, like Saddam, the man you are supporting with your appeasement, are underestimating the steely eyed determination of Pres George W Bush.
He and his admin are fighting for a future free of the evil of terrorism; and are offering true liberation to the Iraqi people.
What are you offering? More pain and misery for those innocents!
Wake up you fools! Saddam is laughing at you!
And thank god John Howard is taking a stand as well, unlike those leftovers of 'Old Europe'.

Dear John

Chances of fundamentalist Islam terrorist attacks in France:

Chance of fundamentalist Islam terrorist attacks in Australia:

You fucking absolute posturing fuckwit.

Viva la France!

"We fell for it," said one U.S. official who reviewed the documents!

About a foot and a half.

My old mate Samuel Johnson once said that patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel. Well, scoundrels have come a long way since then, so allow me to add a little something from my other old mate Oscar Wilde: America is one long expectoration... look it up.

i LIKE it!

i LIKE it!

i LIKE it!

Yugo that is just more pro-Saddam claptrap!
Its an easy question:
Will the world be better off without Saddam's evil regime?

It is a no-brainer answer!

It seems that France and Russia at least do not want America to grab Iraq's oil. See my post about Pro War Mythology.

I don't know who owns the Washington Post but they also report that some of the evidence against Iraq has been fabricated:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A59403-2003Mar7.html

Not everybody else is doing it this time...in fact only....who were the last in for the last big one...unfortunately it created an economy based on military...c'est la

Two things:

1. Yugo, washington post is owned by the Moonies isnt it? A real fount of truth!

2. France did do war by timetable. In 1914 when everyone else did too.

Actually Blix is saying that Iraq is cooperating but not fully complying.... but should we believe the Washington Post?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A54881-2003Mar7.html

I'd rather see Frugal

Ultra Real Ed